Mixed Methods and Triangulation
Combining approaches to compensate for the weaknesses of each - what triangulation means here, the methodological dilemma the source poses, and where the argument stops short.
Research Projects articles in the KEVOS Project Delivery library. 267 pages.
Combining approaches to compensate for the weaknesses of each - what triangulation means here, the methodological dilemma the source poses, and where the argument stops short.
Sequential explanatory design in practice - survey first, interviews second, with the qualitative sections deliberately mirroring the quantitative ones so the strands actually m…
Narrow enough to be interesting, broad enough to find adequate information — the boundary problem, the mind-map sequence, and how to write a title that states its own scope.
The most common threat to a sample, the causal chain the source sets out for how it biases a result, and what you can and cannot do about it after the fact.
Capture the full reference the moment you find it, skim before you read, and build a record that survives to the write-up - plus the one instruction in the source worth arguing …
Questions about the nature of being, why they sit beneath your method choice, and how to surface the reality assumptions you brought to the project without noticing.
A researcher six weeks from submission who cannot start - and the finding the case never states: every one of her problems is a recording failure, not a research failure.
Four examined works whose conclusions claim more than their findings carry - including one that says it disproves a figure it states correctly four times elsewhere.
How blind review works, what it does and does not guarantee, and why the source tells you to weight blind-reviewed journals most heavily when you start a search.
Presenting another's work or ideas as your own - why referencing is the entire defence, and the integrity pressures the source names but does not resolve.
What a proposal must say about managing data while it is gathered, once it is stored, and afterwards - format, access, entry and the storage obligation behind it.
The four terms every quantitative design rests on, defined as the source defines them - and the definition of data that makes a seventh incompatible entry across the six weeks.
Objectively collected factual data, hypotheses and scientific laws — the positivist position, the post-positivist softening to probable facts, and what each demands of a project…
When a review is held, who attends, what is asked, what is produced and what is done with the output - the full anatomy, plus a six-rule conduct checklist.
The data-to-ink principle, the histogram class rule - the week's only formula - and scatter diagrams and line graphs, both named with less construction guidance than tables rece…
Effective digits, row and column order, accumulated percentages and ratios - the table construction rules the source gives, which are the most concrete guidance in the week.
In the text or at the back but never both, numbered in order of reference, and clearly separated from raw data - the placement rules and the appendix boundary they imply.
Data you gather yourself against data gathered by others for other purposes — relevance, timeliness, reliability and the interpretation layer you inherit with secondary sources.
Two proposal shapes for two kinds of research, why a secondary-research proposal needs no detailed methodology section, and a terminology clash worth catching.
Depicting tasks against stages and times, why the timetable is where a proposal quietly fails, and what resources and access have to be established up front.
Why a limit disciplines the writer, which sections should take the majority - and a section headed word limit whose only stated limit is in pages.
A chapter-by-chapter forecast written before the research exists - what it commits you to, and how examined theses show it is never quite what gets built.
Physical and psychological harm, the four risk categories an application must address, researcher safety, and the control-group problem nobody expects.
The analysis steps, the coding vocabulary, the ten questions, the worked categorisation and the full results-and-discussion guidance, consolidated onto a single reference page.
Words versus numbers, judgment versus counting — the two major research designs, what each is good for, and why the choice follows the question rather than preference.
The qualitative methods the source treats at length, the key terms it attaches to four named approaches, and the requirement that the researcher become accepted as one of the gr…
Every definition, sampling type, rule and figure from the quantitative research week and its set reading on one page, each marked by what kind of claim it is and whose.
When a postal questionnaire may be used, and the single quantified performance claim in the whole week - an unattributable return figure that must never be read as a benchmark.
Four portfolio-level displays that turn a list of candidate projects into a defensible allocation, and the strategy table that generates coherent alternatives to choose between.
Five decision-analysis tools applied to R&D project decisions - strategy tables, influence diagrams, sensitivity analysis, decision trees and expected value, with the mechanics …
Every framework, criteria set, formula and classification from the R&D management papers on one page, each marked by what kind of claim it is.
Fundamental research, industrial research and pre-competitive development defined, with the aid intensities and eligible costs attached to each under a framework that expired in…
The key aspects to look for in any display, what a distribution is, and the three features of one the source names - having supplied a measure for none of them.
Four reasons the classical closed-form option-pricing model does not transfer to R&D, the alternative the source proposes, and the conditions under which it holds.
Revisit topic, literature, conceptualisation and question - the twelve review questions that turn an interesting area into a project you can actually run.
The researcher is the instrument, so the instrument has a history - what reflexivity asks of you, and how a position statement is written and where it belongs.
A thesis sets out a correlation coefficient, supplies its formula and an interpretation key, states two results with the wrong sign - and never reports the coefficient itself.
Five years minimum, seven where a state government department is involved, three identifiability classes, and who actually owns the data you collect.
Every definition, checklist, question set and rule from the design, qualitative, data collection and quantitative analysis material on one page, each marked by what kind of clai…
A 1999 thesis with no ethics apparatus and a 2016 thesis with consent, retention and committee contact embedded in its invitation letter - observed practice, not a requirements …
Every principle, right, requirement, application section and retention rule from the ethics material on one page, with what is a requirement and what is an example marked.
Citations that do not resolve, quantities that contradict, a variable never measured - what eight passed theses show about where integrity actually fails.
Why different kinds of question require different kinds of approach, the seven methodologies the source defines, and how methodology sits between philosophy and method.
Every table, list and checklist in the supplied source on a single page — the process models, the philosophies, the methodologies, the screening questions and the decision poi…
Every component, checklist and question from the proposal material on one page - the two component lists, the scope tests, and the hypothesis rules.
Every term defined in the supplied teaching source, consolidated into one reference — with the conflicting definitions marked rather than reconciled.
The fourteen broad themes the source suggests for project management research, what a viable question inside each looks like, and the source's own caveat about the list.
Three of four triangulation types claimed, a second coder, a standardised instrument used pre and post - what demonstrating rigour actually looked like in an examined qualitativ…