Descriptive and Inferential Statistics
The two branches of statistical analysis as the source distinguishes them, its eight-term vocabulary table, and the sixteen analysis issues it lists as bare labels.
Research Projects articles in the KEVOS Project Delivery library. 267 pages.
The two branches of statistical analysis as the source distinguishes them, its eight-term vocabulary table, and the sixteen analysis issues it lists as bare labels.
Observation recorded for later analysis, its dependence on human responses, and the two distortions the source names: selective observation and biased interviews.
The three research purposes named in the teaching source, the verbs that signal each one, and how the purpose you choose constrains every later design decision.
A student asked to design a data collection tool and discuss its suitability - what the submission delivered, what it did not, and how much of the shortfall the brief itself cau…
Layout, order, length and the covering explanation - the design rules the source gives, in the sequence you apply them, and the pilot stage it mentions without describing.
Limit conclusions to what the results support, give equal weight to negative findings, and treat post hoc analyses as explanatory - three disciplines that are harder than they s…
Focus groups, a systematic review, a Delphi panel, two case studies and three surveys - what each design could establish, at what scale, and what each work actually demonstrated.
A formal model, a regulatory analysis, three empirical studies, a case study and four practitioner syntheses - what each kind of paper can evidence, and what it cannot.
The theory of knowing, why answering epistemological questions means justifying your methodology, and the two different definitions the supplied source gives for the same word.
Five issues at proposal stage and six at design stage, whose rights are in play at each, and the four stages the supplied source never covers.
Three real cases from the supplied source - a skipped training video, a wrong submission route and a dependent group - and what each cost the researcher.
Why review panels exist, what dual approval means when your workplace hosts the study, and the one thing you must never do before clearance arrives.
Ten questions to answer about every piece of writing you read - from what school of thought it follows to what data backs its argument - and how to record the answers usefully.
Participants as equal partners in design and interpretation, and research carried out in the real world with little or no control over independent variables.
The three forms the research process takes — identifying a problem, testing theory and proposing solutions, and gaining evidence from observation — and how a project moves betwe…
Five objective selection techniques set out with their inputs, their arithmetic and the conditions under which each one misleads.
Econometric evaluation, mathematical modelling, comparative survey, single case study and formal theory - five published designs, only one of which collects data from people.
The supposition to be tested, the precise difference between rejecting and supporting, and why a hypothesis is never proved - only supported until superseded.
Four beliefs about new product failure that an empirical study set out to overturn, what it found instead, and how much weight one study can carry.
The other philosophical frameworks named in the source and the pyramid — functionalism, symbolic interactionism, feminism, critical theory, post-structuralism and postmodernism …
Who decides, who analyses and who is accountable - the organisational arrangements a quantified R&D decision process requires, and why the tools fail without them.
Four different characterisations of an outlier across four slides of one deck, the questions asked about them, and the detection rule that is never supplied.
Every element in a journal reference and a book reference, in order, with what is italicised and what is quoted - and an honest list of the source types the supplied material ne…
Synthesising evidence about the past through where, who, when and what — and the comparative extension across societies in the past or in parallel in the present.
Eight attempts at the hardest paragraph in a thesis - the one that says why the study should exist - ranked by what each actually establishes.
The question the source poses on its own slide and never answers. What it does supply, where the only numbers in the dataset come from, and why they do not transfer.
Not expected to be extensive - what a proposal-stage review must nonetheless demonstrate, and how it differs from the review in the finished thesis.
Emergent, two-chapter, standalone-paper, funnel and no-review-section - five published solutions to the same problem, and how to tell which one your project needs.
The subject's own closing statement about itself - that you will not apply most of this immediately and are expected to return to it during your thesis - and what that reframes.
The gap is what justifies your study existing. How to find one, how to state it so it can be checked, and five real gap statements from published research compared.
Defining your variables before you collect anything - the two-way distinction the source gives, why the direction of the arrow is a claim, and the variable types it omits.
Generating explanations from data against collecting data to test a prior proposition — the two directions of inference and how each shapes sampling, analysis and claims.
Thirty-one open-ended responses sorted into six inductive categories - the only complete worked analysis in six weeks of teaching material, set out in full with what it does not…
Doing action research where you are the boss, and the promise to participants that gets quietly dropped once the researcher leaves the site - two problems the source names plainly.
People provide their own accounts of situations and behaviours — the interpretive position and the six associated traditions the source groups beneath it.
Semi-structured, in-depth and expert interviews across four studies - how many, how selected, how recorded, and the deliberate tactic of never asking the headline question direc…
The interview types the source distinguishes, what each is suited to, and how the choice follows from how much you already know about the answer space.
Nominal, ordinal and interval response choices, what each permits at analysis - and the fourth level the source never names, which is where most project measures actually sit.
Every checklist, question set and structure from the literature review material on a single page - the search rules, the credibility tests, the reading questions and the writing…
Lower case, synonyms, most important word first, quotation marks, wildcards and advanced filters - six search rules that decide whether you find the work that already answers yo…
Twelve critical variables, ranked, and a stage-specific model that replaces single-indicator tracking - because one indicator changes meaning as a project advances.
Five factors that shape how steeply cost rises with speed, what complexity does to the curve, and the estimation approach the source offers for pricing an acceleration decision.
Assigning symbols and numbers by rule, and the claim that measurement must be reliable before findings can be called valid - what that dependency does to your instrument decisions.
Mean, median and mode as the source defines them - including the definition whose label and procedure disagree, and the fact that none of the three is ever computed.
A widely quoted failure rate, the measurement model that disputes it, and why definitions of success decide the answer before any data is collected.
The four things every step must be appropriate to, the two 'fit' rules the source states, and a coherence audit you can run over your own design before you defend it.
The decisions that fix a methodology before any data is gathered - what each one commits you to, and which of them the supplied material states without explaining.
Methods are the techniques used to gather data - the one-line definition the source gives, why methods sit below methodology, and what follows when the two words are used interc…