← LibraryAlgorithms for Elliptic Curves over ℚEngineering · MathematicsLesson 4/4← PrevNext →
GuidePublished 6 Aug 20265 min readBy Kevin JoginComputational Number TheoryElliptic CurvesTate AlgorithmMinimal Model
Skip to the main content

MathematicsElliptic Curves

Algorithms for Elliptic Curves over ℚ

Minimal models, Tate's algorithm, torsion determination and the descent machinery for finding rational points.

Executive summary

Standardise the model, then extract the arithmetic

The first step with any curve over ℚ is to replace it by its minimal model, so that invariants are canonical and comparable. Tate's algorithm then determines the reduction type, Tamagawa number and conductor exponent at each bad prime. Torsion is settled by a short search constrained by Mazur's theorem. Rank requires descent, which produces an upper bound and a point search, and may leave a gap attributable to the Tate–Shafarevich group.

Learning objectives

  • Compute a minimal Weierstrass model.
  • Apply Tate's algorithm to obtain the reduction type and conductor.
  • Determine the torsion subgroup using Mazur's constraint.
  • Explain the structure of a descent computation.
  • Use canonical heights to test independence of points.

Section 01Minimal models

Weierstrass equations related by the admissible substitutions form an isomorphism class; the minimal model is the one whose discriminant has the smallest absolute value. Over ℚ it exists and is unique up to the remaining trivial transformations.

Why minimality matters

The conductor, the Tamagawa numbers and the real period are all defined relative to the minimal model. Computing them from a non-minimal equation gives wrong values — and they will still look like plausible values, so the error will not announce itself. Minimising first is not optional.

The minimal model is found by computing the invariants c4c6, Δ, then removing twelfth powers from Δ consistently with fourth and sixth powers in c4 and c6 — a prime-by-prime reduction requiring the factorisation of the discriminant.

Section 02Tate's algorithm

At each prime dividing the minimal discriminant, Tate's algorithm classifies the reduction by a sequence of tests on the coefficients, outputting the Kodaira symbol, the Tamagawa number and the conductor exponent.

Reduction types and their data
Kodaira typeReductionTamagawa number cpConductor exponent
I0Good10
In (n ≥ 1)Multiplicativen or gcd(n, 2), by splitting1
II, II*Additive1≥ 2
III, III*Additive2≥ 2
IV, IV*Additive1 or 3≥ 2
In*Additive2 or 4≥ 2
Where the conductor is used

The conductor is the level of the modular form attached to the curve, so it is the key into modular form databases and is how curves are indexed in standard tables. The Tamagawa numbers enter the strong BSD formula directly.

Section 03Torsion

AlgorithmTorsion subgroup determinationin: E over ℚ  →  out: E(ℚ)tors
  1. Compute the minimal model and its discriminant.
  2. Apply Nagell–Lutz: a torsion point has integral coordinates with y = 0 or y2 dividing the discriminant. A finite list of candidates.
  3. Alternatively and usually faster, reduce modulo several primes of good reduction; the torsion injects into E(Fp), so gcd of the group orders bounds it.
  4. Test each candidate by computing its multiples until the identity or an excessively large coordinate appears.
  5. Confirm the resulting group is one of the fifteen allowed by Mazur's theorem.
Mazur's theorem restricts the torsion subgroup to a cyclic group of order 1 to 10 or 12, or a product of ℤ/2 with a cyclic group of order 2, 4, 6 or 8. Any other answer is an error.
Reduction is the practical method

Reducing modulo a handful of good primes and taking the gcd of the group orders usually pins down the torsion immediately and costs almost nothing. Nagell–Lutz is the certificate; reduction is the search.

Section 04Rank and descent

  1. Stage 012-descentMap E(ℚ)/2E(ℚ) into a Selmer group computed from local conditions, giving an upper bound on the rank.
  2. Stage 02Search for pointsLook for rational points of bounded height, giving a lower bound. Sieving and lattice methods extend the reachable height.
  3. Stage 03Compare boundsIf the upper and lower bounds agree, the rank is determined.
  4. Stage 04Handle the gapA discrepancy is attributed to the Tate–Shafarevich group; higher descents or Heegner point constructions may close it.

Independence of found points is tested by the canonical height pairing: the height regulator matrix is non-singular exactly when the points are independent, and its determinant enters the strong BSD formula.

Descent may not terminate conclusively

Rank computation is not a guaranteed-terminating algorithm. A 2-descent may leave a gap that higher descents fail to close, and generators of very large height may escape any feasible search. Reported ranks should carry their method and any conditionality.

ReferenceFrequently asked questions

Why do curves need to be minimised before comparison?

Because the same curve has infinitely many Weierstrass equations with different discriminants. Without minimisation, two equations for the same curve appear to have different invariants and database lookups fail.

How large can the coordinates of a generator be?

There is no known effective bound in general, and curves are known whose smallest generator has coordinates with hundreds of digits. This is precisely why rank computation is hard and why the analytic prediction is valuable as a guide.

What is the canonical height for?

It is a quadratic form on the Mordell-Weil group that measures the arithmetic size of a point and is compatible with the group law. It is used to test independence of points, to bound searches, and it appears in the strong BSD formula through the regulator.

NavigateContinue in this stream

Curated next steps from this page. The site also surfaces algorithmically related reading below.

ProvenanceSources and further reading

This page is an original KEVOS explanatory article. It presents the underlying mathematics — definitions, algorithms, complexity results and selection criteria — in KEVOS editorial voice. No text is reproduced from any copyrighted source. Where numerical tables are relevant, KEVOS links to live authoritative databases rather than republishing static values.

Page ID
KV-MATH-0043
Taxonomy
ENG-MATH — Engineering / Mathematics
Collection
COL-CANT-001
Topic stream
CANT-ELLIPTIC-CURVES
Version
1.1.0 / content 2026.08
Last reviewed
2026-08-06

Continue learning

Elliptic Curve L-functions and the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer ConjectureGuide · MathematicsComplex Multiplication and Class FieldsGuide · MathematicsElliptic Curves: Definitions and the Group LawGuide · MathematicsComputational Algebraic Number Theory: Discipline OverviewGuide · Mathematics