← LibraryStakeholder Communication Plan — Worked ExampleTemplates & Examples · ExamplesLesson 2/9← PrevNext →
TemplatePublished 10 Jul 2026Updated 3 Aug 20263 min readBy Kevin Joginstakeholder managementcommunication planworked exampleengagement
KEVOS® Templates & Examples · Examples

Templates & Examples / Examples

Communication Plan — Worked Example

Eight audiences, four owners, one operating plant. A communication plan worked end-to-end — with the reasoning left in.

  • Reading time · 3 min
  • 6 sections
  • 8 audiences · 4 owners
  • Power–interest mapped
Interest → Power → Keep satisfied Manage closely Monitor Keep informed Sponsor Operations Regulator Maintenance Workforce Finance Tenants Procurement Quadrant sets the default channel and frequency — the plan in §3 follows it row by row
Doc №TE-EXM-001
SectionTemplates & Examples → Examples
Sheet1 of 1
DrawnKEVOS®
Date2026-07-10

§1The scenario

A realistic mid-size job, so the choices in the plan have something to push against.

The project: a conveyor and drive upgrade inside an operating food-manufacturing plant — fourteen weeks, one planned production shutdown for tie-in, an external HSE regulator interface, and neighbouring tenants inside noise range. Delivery is routine; the communication load is not. Eight audiences, each needing different information at a different rhythm through a different channel, is exactly the situation a written plan exists for.

How to use this page. Read the plan in §3 with the stakeholder map above, then §4 for why each row is shaped that way. Adapt names, keep the shapes.

Contents

§2From map to plan

The power–interest quadrant sets each audience’s default; the plan then earns its exceptions.

Manage closely (high power, high interest) gets synchronous channels and short cycles. Keep satisfied (high power, low interest) gets concise, formal, infrequent contact — enough to prevent surprises, never enough to create work. Keep informed gets broadcast channels on a reliable rhythm, and monitor gets triggered contact only. Every row in §3 can be traced back to a quadrant, and the two deliberate exceptions are explained in §4.

Contents

§3The plan — eight audiences

Audience · message · channel · frequency · owner. One row per audience, no orphans.

AudienceCore messageChannelFrequencyOwner
Sponsor & steering groupCost, schedule and risk position; decisions neededOne-page dashboard + steering meetingMonthlyProject Manager
Operations managerShutdown windows, tie-in dates, production impactFace-to-face + confirming emailFortnightlyProject Manager
Maintenance teamWhat changes on their equipment and whenToolbox talkFortnightlyProject Engineer
Site workforceLook-ahead, access changes, safety alertsNoticeboard + pre-start briefWeeklySite Lead
ProcurementLong-lead status, delivery risksShared tracker + callWeeklyProject Engineer
HSE regulator liaisonPermit status, incident notificationsFormal letter / portalAs requiredHSE Advisor
FinanceAccruals, forecast at completionCost reportMonthlyProject Manager
Neighbouring tenantsNoise, traffic and outage noticesLetter drop + noticeboardBefore each impactSite Lead
Contents

§4Reading the choices

A plan is a set of arguments. These are the ones worth copying.

Operations gets face-to-face

Highest-power internal stakeholder whose goodwill controls the shutdown window. Email alone lets misunderstandings compound silently; the confirming email after the conversation creates the record without carrying the relationship.

The regulator gets formality

Low frequency, maximum precision. Everything in writing, through the official channel, in the regulator’s own format — informal chat with a regulator is risk generation, not communication.

The workforce gets rhythm, not volume

A weekly look-ahead at the pre-start beats a daily bulletin nobody reads. Predictability is the message: people forgive inconvenience they were warned about.

Tenants are triggered, not scheduled

“Before each impact” beats monthly letters — a notice with nothing in it trains recipients to stop reading, which is the one failure this audience cannot afford.

Contents

§5Adapting the example

Change the nouns, keep the tests.

Three tests keep an adapted plan honest. Coverage: every stakeholder on the map appears in exactly one row. Ownership: every row names one person, and no person owns a channel they never use. Load: total up each owner’s column — a plan the project manager cannot actually execute in a normal week is a wish, and the register in §3 deliberately spreads the eight rows across four owners for that reason.

Contents

§6Quick reference

The working core of the resource on one card rack.

Map first

Power × interest sets the default channel and rhythm.

One row each

Every audience appears once — with one owner.

Exceptions argued

Depart from the quadrant only with a written reason.

Load test

Sum each owner’s rows; wishes aren’t plans.

Contents

Continue learning

Assumption Log: Website Project ExampleTemplate · ExamplesNEXT LESSON →Risk Register Example: Website RedesignTemplate · ExamplesStakeholder Register ExampleTemplate · ExamplesCommunications Management Plan ExampleTemplate · Examples