← ArticlesRetaining Rings: Selection, Grooves and Installation: Retaining Ring StandardsEngineering · Machine DesignLesson 43/53← PrevNext →
GuidePublished 14 Aug 20267 min readBy Kevin JoginMachine DesignFasteners and JointsRetaining Rings: SelectionGrooves and Installation

Engineering · Machine Design · Fasteners and Joints

Retaining Rings: Selection, Grooves and Installation: Retaining Ring Standards

Engineering handbook for retaining rings: selection, grooves and installation, covering retaining ring standards — complete reference, military standards,...

Executive summary

This handbook section converts the supplied engineering material into a practical, source-controlled reference. It concentrates on the following learning outcomes.

Retaining Ring Standards — Complete Reference
Military Standards
Aerospace Standards
ANSI Standards
ANSI/SAE Standards
DIN Standards

Retaining Ring Standards — Complete Reference


Military Standards

Standard Designation Description
MIL-R-21248B MS-16633 Open-type external uniform cross-section
MIL-R-21248B MS-16634 Open-type external uniform cross-section, cylindrically bowed
MIL-R-21248B MS-3215 Open-type external tapered cross-section
MIL-R-21248B MS-16632 Crescent-type external
MIL-R-21248B MS-16625 Internal
MIL-R-21248B MS-16629 Internal cylindrically bowed
MIL-R-21248B MS-16624 Closed-type external tapered cross-section
MIL-R-21248B MS-16628 Closed-type external tapered, cylindrically bowed
MIL-R-21248B MS-16627 Internal inverted
MIL-R-21248B MS-16626 Closed-type external tapered cross-section
MIL-R-21248B MS-90707 Self-locking external tapered cross-section
MIL-R-21248B MS-3217 External heavy-duty tapered cross-section
MIL-R-27426 Type 1-External, Type 2-Internal Uniform cross-section spiral retaining rings

Aerospace Standards

Standard Description
AS 3215 Ring, Retaining — Spiral, Internal, Heavy Duty, Stainless Steel
AS 3216 Ring, Retaining — Spiral, External, Heavy Duty, Stainless Steel
AS 3217 Ring, Retaining — Spiral, Internal, Light Duty, Stainless Steel
AS 3218 Ring, Retaining — Spiral, External, Light Duty, Stainless Steel
AS 3219 Ring, Wound — Dimensional and Acceptance Standard for Spiral Wound Retaining Rings

ANSI Standards

Standard Description
B27.6-1972, R1983 General Purpose Uniform Cross-Section Spiral Retaining Rings
B27.7M-1977, R1983 General Purpose Tapered and Reduced Cross-Section Retaining Rings (Metric)
B27.2M-1977, R1983 General Purpose Metric Tapered and Reduced Cross-Section Retaining Rings — Types 3DM1 (Heavy Duty External), 3EM1 (Reinforced E-Rings), 3FM1 (C-Type Rings)

ANSI/SAE Standards

Standard Description
MA4016 External Spiral Wound, Heavy and Medium Duty, Crescent, Metric
MA4017 External Spiral Wound, Heavy and Medium Duty, Crescent, Metric
MA4020 External Tapered, Type 1, Class 2, AMS 5520, Metric
MA4021 Internal Tapered, Type 1, Class 1, AMS 5520, Metric
MA4029 Internal, Beveled, Tapered, Type 2, Class 1, AMS 5520, Metric
MA4030 External, Reinforced E-Ring, Type 1, Class 3, AMS 5520, Metric
MA4035 Spiral Wound, Uniform Section, Corrosion Resistant, Metric
MA4036 Tapered Width, Uniform Thickness, Corrosion Resistant, Metric

DIN Standards

Standard Description
DIN 471, 472, 6799, 984, 5417, 7993 Normal and heavy type, internal and external retaining rings and retaining washers
LN 471, 472, 6799 Aerospace standards for internal and external retaining rings


The Decision Matrix: Choosing the Right Retaining Ring

When you're standing at the design desk or the maintenance workbench, use this matrix to narrow your selection:

Application Requirement Best Ring Type Why
General shaft retention, metric 3AM1 Tapered External Broadest size range, well-documented loads
General bore retention, metric 3BM1 Tapered Internal Covers 8–250 mm bores
Very small shafts (1–25 mm) 3CM1 E-Ring Reduced cross-section, minimal footprint
Gapless shoulder required Spiral-wound (MIL-R-27426) No gap for parts to snag through
High thrust loads, inch Heavy Duty Spiral (Class 2) Highest capacity, shaft to 15 in.
Bidirectional rotation Stamped (any type) No unwinding concern
High-speed applications Self-locking rings Designed to resist centrifugal ejection
No groove allowed Self-locking (7100 Series) Grips shaft by spring action alone
Corrosive environment Type 302 or 316 SS ring Resists rusting and chemical attack
High temperature (to 900°F) A286 superalloy Retains spring properties at temperature
Extreme temperature (to 1,200°F) Inconel X-750 Maximum temperature capability
Food industry Type 316 SS FDA-compatible corrosion resistance
Aerospace / military Per applicable MS or AS standard Qualified to military/aerospace specs


Quick-Reference Formula Card

Cut this out and pin it to your wall. Every formula you need for retaining ring design:

Formula Equation Use For
Ring Shear Thrust Ps=πDtSsKP_s = \frac{\pi D t S_s}{K} Maximum load before ring shears
Groove Deformation Thrust PG=πDdSyKP_G = \frac{\pi D d S_y}{K} Maximum load before groove yields
Minimum Groove Distance Y=KPtπDScY = \frac{K P_t}{\pi D S_c} How far from shaft/bore end to cut groove
Max Total Radius 0.5(bd)0.5(b - d) Whether full thrust loads apply
Max Total Chamfer 0.375(bd)0.375(b - d) Whether full thrust loads apply
Allowable Speed N=0.466C1E3×1012Rn3(1+C1)(Ro3Ri3)N = \sqrt{\frac{0.466 C_1 E^3 \times 10^{12}}{R_n^3(1+C_1)(R_o^3 - R_i^3)}} Maximum RPM for external spiral ring
Ring Cling (External Spiral) C1=CGGC_1 = \frac{C - G}{G} Input for speed calculation
Design Thrust Load min(Ps,PG)\min(P_s, P_G) Always use the lower value


the practitioner's Final Audit Checklist

After rebuilding the conveyor and auditing every retaining ring application in the plant, the practitioner created this checklist. She laminated copies and posted them at every maintenance workstation. It has prevented every repeat failure since.


Before Specifying a Retaining Ring


Before Machining the Groove


Before Installing the Ring


After Installation



The Lesson That Cost Six Figures

the practitioner's conveyor failure was caused by ten thousandths of an inch in the wrong direction on a groove bottom radius. The ring was correctly specified. The material was correct. The load was within published limits. But the groove — that single machined feature that the ring depends on entirely — was out of specification by an amount invisible to the naked eye.

That is the fundamental truth of retaining rings: They are only as reliable as the grooves they sit in, the loads they're subjected to, and the attention to detail of the people who specify, machine, and install them.

The next time you reach for a snap ring or specify a retaining ring in a design, remember the practitioner's rule: "The ring is cheap. The groove is critical. The failure is expensive."



Your Next Step

Print the formula card. Laminate the practitioner's checklist. The next retaining ring you specify or install, run the numbers — ring shear, groove deformation, minimum groove distance, maximum total radius. Compare your actual loads to both the ring and groove capacities and use the lower value.

And if you have a colleague who still thinks retaining rings are "just snap rings that don't matter," share this guide. Because that tiny, invisible shoulder is the only thing standing between a running machine and a catastrophic, costly, and completely preventable failure.

What's the most common retaining ring failure mode you've encountered in your facility? Is it groove deformation, ring shear, or something the handbooks don't cover?


This guide is based on data from ANSI B27.7M-1977 (R1983), MIL-R-21248B, MIL-R-27426, and standard industrial retaining ring engineering references. All thrust load values include the safety factors noted in each table. For critical applications, always verify with current editions of applicable standards and consult the ring manufacturer's engineering data.

Engineering use and verification

Begin with load paths, motion, interfaces and credible failure modes. Define duty cycle, environment, alignment, lubrication, manufacturing variation and maintenance access before choosing a component. Check static strength, fatigue, stiffness, heat, wear and fastening together because improving one constraint can worsen another. Record assumptions and verify the assembled system, not just catalogue ratings for isolated parts.

  • Confirm scope, assumptions, interfaces and required outcome.
  • Use one controlled unit system and show every conversion.
  • Identify current project, customer and regulatory requirements.
  • Separate source examples from mandatory acceptance criteria.
  • Check calculations, tables and selections by an independent method.
  • Verify safety, maintainability and credible failure modes.
  • Record evidence, revisions, approvals and unresolved limitations.
  • Validate the result under representative operating conditions.

Continue learning

Retaining Rings: Selection, Grooves and Installation: Metric E-Type External Retaining RingsGuide · Machine DesignNEXT LESSON →Bolted Joint Design: Preload, Torque and Failure Prevention: A 250,000-Dollar Lesson Stamped Into SteelGuide · Machine DesignRetaining Rings: Selection, Grooves and Installation: The Invisible ShoulderGuide · Machine DesignBolted Joint Design: Preload, Torque and Failure Prevention: How to Count Radial LinesGuide · Machine Design