KEVOS
ArticlesServicesCase studiesAboutContact
ArticlesServicesCase studiesAboutContact
← ArticlesInequalities and Interval NotationEngineering · Engineering MathematicsLesson 1/4← PrevNext →
GuidePublished 15 Aug 20265 min readBy Kevin Jogininequalitiesinterval notationnumber lineorder
On this page

Ask about this page

KEVOS AIInequalities and Interval Notation

KEVOS knowledge first · trusted web sources when needed

Inequalities and Absolute Value

Inequalities and Interval Notation

Order on the real line, the two notations for describing an interval, and the one rule that makes solving an inequality different from solving an equation.

Category Engineering / MathematicsStream Inequalities and Absolute ValueLevel FoundationReading 5 minSource Week 3, pages 9-11

What this page covers

  • Read and write interval and set notation for a region of the line
  • Solve a linear inequality, reversing the sign where required
  • Represent a solution on a number line with open and closed endpoints
  • Say why inequalities are a real-number topic only
On this page
  1. Order on the real line
  2. Interval notation
  3. Solving linear inequalities
  4. An applied example from the source
  5. Common mistakes
  6. Frequently asked questions

Order on the real line

An inequality compares size. The source opens the topic with a restriction that is easy to read past and important to keep: inequalities apply only in the real numbers.

Note

There is no way to order the complex numbers that respects the arithmetic. Asking whether i > 0 leads to a contradiction either way, so < is simply not defined there. Every inequality on this page is a statement about ℝ.

a < b
a is less than b
b > a
b is greater than a &mdash; the same statement
a ≤ x
a is less than or equal to x
x ≥ a
x is greater than or equal to a
a < x < b
x lies strictly between a and b

The double form a < x < b is an abbreviation for two statements at once: a < x and x < b. The source introduces it that way, which is the safe reading.

Interval notation

A solution is usually a stretch of the line rather than a handful of points, and interval notation names such a stretch compactly.

The four bounded intervals plus the unbounded ones
InequalityIntervalEndpointsMeaning
a < x < b(a, b)Both openBetween, excluding both ends
a ≤ x ≤ b[a, b]Both closedBetween, including both ends
a ≤ x < b[a, b)Left closed, right openIncludes a, excludes b
a < x ≤ b(a, b]Left open, right closedExcludes a, includes b
x > a(a, ∞)Open at aEverything above a
x ≤ b(-∞, b]Closed at bEverything up to and including b
Infinity always takes a round bracket

∞ is a direction, not a number, and no value equals it. [3, ∞) is correct; [3, ∞] is not. The bracket at the finite end is decided independently.

15

(1, 5] &mdash; hollow at 1 because it is excluded, solid at 5 because it is included.

Set notation says the same thing differently: {x : 1 < x ≤ 5}, read as the set of x such that. Both appear in the source, and both are worth being fluent in.

Solving linear inequalities

The method is that of linear equations with one exception, which the source sets out in capitals.

The three operations
OperationEffect on the inequality
Add or subtract from both sidesSign unchanged
Multiply or divide by a positive numberSign unchanged
Multiply or divide by a negative numberSign reverses

The reason is geometric. Multiplying by -1 reflects the line through zero, and reflection reverses order. The source illustrates with the pair 3 < 4 and -3 > -4, which is as clear a demonstration as any.

&minus;4&minus;334

3 < 4 on the right; reflecting gives -3 > -4 on the left. The order has flipped.

Worked example &mdash; no reversal

2x - 5 > 32x > 8x > 4Source example, Week 3, page 11. Division by +2 keeps the sign
4

x > 4, that is (4, ∞).

Worked example &mdash; with reversal

3x - 4 > 5 + 4x3x - 4x > 5 + 4-x > 9x < -9Source example, Week 3, page 11. Dividing by -1 reverses the sign
Check

Test x = -10: left 3(-10) - 4 = -34, right 5 + 4(-10) = -35, and -34 > -35. Correct. Test x = 0: -4 > 5 is false, as it should be.

Substituting one value from inside the claimed solution and one from outside it is a complete check on the direction of the sign, and takes seconds.

An applied example from the source

How long is the ball in the air?

The source models a ball thrown upward with height h = 495t - 4910t2 and asks for how long h > 0.

495t - 4910t2 > 098t - 49t2 > 049t(2 - t) > 0Source example, Week 3, page 11. Multiply through by 10, then factor

The product is positive when both factors share a sign. For t > 0, the first factor is positive, so the second must be too: 2 - t > 0, that is t < 2.

0 < t < 2The ball is in the air for 2 seconds
Note

The lower bound t > 0 comes from the physical situation, not from the algebra. Negative time is not meaningful here, and stating that explicitly is part of the answer. The source writes t < 2; the full interval is (0, 2).

Common mistakes

Errors and checks
MistakeCorrectCheck
Not reversing after dividing by a negativeThe sign flipsTest one value from inside the answer
[3, ∞][3, ∞)Infinity is never attained
Solid dot for a strict inequalityHollow dot< and > exclude the endpoint
Treating a < x < b as one statement to manipulate looselyIt is two statementsSplit them if in any doubt
Multiplying by an expression of unknown signSplit into cases, or use a sign diagramx could be negative and flip the inequality
Applying inequalities to complex numbersNot definedOrder exists on ℝ only

Frequently asked questions

Why does multiplying by a negative reverse the sign?

Because multiplying by -1 reflects the line through zero, and reflection reverses order. 3 < 4 but -3 > -4. The source gives exactly this pair as the illustration.

When is an endpoint open and when closed?

Closed (a solid dot, a square bracket) when the endpoint itself satisfies the inequality, which happens with ≤ and ≥. Open (a hollow dot, a round bracket) with strict < and >.

Why is ∞ always given a round bracket?

Because it is not a number and cannot be attained. (3, ∞) is correct; [3, ∞] is not, whatever the other endpoint does.

Do inequalities work for complex numbers?

No. The source states that inequalities apply only in the real numbers. There is no ordering of the complex numbers compatible with the arithmetic.

Related pages

  • Sign Diagrams for Quadratic and Rational Inequalities
  • Absolute Value Equations and Inequalities
  • The Real Number System and Its Subsets
  • The Implied Domain of a Function

Source. Handwritten teaching notes, Week 3, pages 9-11.

This page is an original exposition prepared for the KEVOS® knowledge library. It restates, reorganises and verifies the mathematics of the supplied teaching notes; it is not a reproduction of them. Numerical values taken from the notes are identified as source examples and are not presented as engineering standards.

Continue learning

NEXT LESSON →Sign Diagrams for Quadratic and Rational InequalitiesGuide · Engineering MathematicsAbsolute Value: Definition and PropertiesGuide · Engineering MathematicsAbsolute Value Equations and InequalitiesGuide · Engineering MathematicsThe Implied Domain of a FunctionGuide · Engineering Mathematics
KEVOS · Engineering, manufacturing and project improvement
ArticlesServicesCase studiesAboutContact
© 2026 KEVOS®