Context and scope
Every child deserves to learn in a room where the air is clean, the temperature is comfortable, and the only sound they hear is their teacher's voice. Yet across thousands of schools worldwide, outdated and poorly designed HVAC systems silently sabotage the learning environment every single day.
This is the story of how a fictional facilities director named the practitioner inherited a district-wide HVAC disaster — and the engineering journey that turned it around. Along the way, you'll discover everything you need to know about designing, selecting, and optimizing HVAC systems for schools, from elementary classrooms to sprawling high school campuses.
Whether you're an engineer designing your first school project, a facilities manager evaluating upgrade options, or a school board member trying to understand why your utility bill keeps climbing, this guide was written for you.
Understanding the Battlefield: What Makes School HVAC Different
Before the practitioner could fix anything, he needed to understand why school HVAC is fundamentally different from commercial office design. This distinction trips up even experienced engineers.
The School Ecosystem
A typical school district consists of a hierarchy that directly impacts HVAC planning:
| School Type | Typical Facilities | Occupancy Pattern | HVAC Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elementary (K–5/6) | 10–15 classrooms, admin area, gym, library | Late Aug–June, 7 AM–3 PM | Seasonal use, limited summer cooling needs |
| Middle School (6/7–9) | All of above + computer labs, locker rooms | Extended hours for extracurriculars | More diverse HVAC zones required |
| High School (10–12) | All of above + cafeterias, shops, natatoriums, auditoriums | Year-round use, summer programs | Maximum complexity, multiple dedicated systems |
| Colleges/Technical | Similar to high school | Year-round, including evenings | Night programs extend operating hours |
The key insight the practitioner discovered: Each space type within a school has radically different HVAC requirements. A one-size-fits-all approach guarantees failure somewhere.
The Spaces That Demand Special Attention
the practitioner walked every building in his district with a clipboard and a thermal camera. Here's what he cataloged — and what you should consider in every school project:
Standard Classrooms are typically 84–93 m² (roughly 900–1,000 ft²) and hold 20–30 students. At minimum, every classroom needs heating and ventilation. Middle and high school classrooms increasingly need air conditioning. In hot or humid climates, even elementary classrooms should be cooled.
- Heating loads peak early in the day when ventilation switches to occupied mode
- Cooling loads peak late in the day
- Elementary classrooms generally have at least one exterior wall with windows
- Attached washrooms may require local exhaust
Gymnasiums operate on evenings and weekends. A dedicated HVAC system handles the range of loads and scheduling. If a wood floor is installed, humidity control becomes critical — consult the flooring manufacturer directly.
Administrative Areas are occupied before, during, and after school hours. A dedicated system handles the longer schedule. Because occupancy is lower than classrooms, the outdoor air requirement drops — a first-cost and operating-cost opportunity most designers miss.
Cafeterias and Auditoriums present a special ventilation challenge because of extreme population density swings. A cafeteria may go from empty to 500 students in minutes. Kitchens require specialized ventilation and fire prevention equipment per NFPA requirements.
Science Classrooms scale in complexity with grade level:
| Grade Level | Typical Requirements |
|---|---|
| Elementary | Additional ventilation for demonstrations, animal habitats |
| Middle School | Fume hoods, chemical-resistant materials, higher ventilation rates |
| High School | Full fume hoods, makeup air systems, continuous ventilation for prep/storage |
Computer Classrooms generate significant sensible heat. Here are the heat gain values the practitioner used for planning:
| Component | Continuous (Watts) | Energy Saver (Watts) |
|---|---|---|
| Average computer | 55 | 20 |
| Conservative estimate | 65 | 25 |
| Highly conservative | 75 | 30 |
| Small monitor (13"–15") | 55 | 0 |
| Medium monitor (16"–18") | 70 | 0 |
| Large monitor (19"–20") | 80 | 0 |
| Typical laser printer | 215 | 35 |
Source: ASHRAE Journal, adapted for general reference
Auto Repair Shops need outdoor ventilation and makeup air for fume dilution. Return air from shops should never be used in other spaces. The shop must maintain negative pressure. Welding fume extraction may also be required.
Natatoriums demand dedicated HVAC for humidity control from the pool surface. Get this wrong and you'll be dealing with structural damage from condensation within years.
Locker Rooms with showers or toilets need direct exhaust to the outside with makeup air to offset. Heating and ventilation only — schedule shutdown during unoccupied hours.
Home Economics Rooms produce high sensible heat from appliances. Kitchen fume hoods and makeup air may be required. Maintain negative pressure to contain odors.
Ice Rinks require specialized HVAC to maintain ice quality without fogging while keeping spectators comfortable.
The Classroom Load Breakdown That Changes Everything
the practitioner modeled a typical south-facing classroom in their climate zone. The results stunned the practitioner:
Cooling Load Components:
| Load Source | Percentage of Total |
|---|---|
| Occupants | 26% |
| Outdoor air (at ventilation unit) | 20% |
| Glass/solar | 19% |
| Local ventilation load | 13% |
| Roof | 10% |
| Lighting | 6% |
| Electrical equipment | 6% |
| Walls | 0.6% |
Heating Load Components:
| Load Source | Percentage of Total |
|---|---|
| Ventilation air (central) | 59% |
| Roof | 28% |
| Glass | 5.5% |
| Local ventilation | 4% |
| Walls | 3.5% |
"Do you see it?" the practitioner asked the practitioner, pointing at the data.
The outdoor air load dominated everything. For cooling, it represented 33% of the total classroom load (20% at the central unit plus 13% locally). For heating, ventilation air accounted for a staggering 63% of heat loss.
The Critical Conclusion
the practitioner drew a circle around the occupant and outdoor air numbers: "Every classroom in your district — north side, south side, interior core — behaves approximately the same. The behavior is dictated by outdoor weather and occupancy, not by envelope loads."
This meant two things:
- All classrooms will have similar HVAC needs, regardless of orientation
- The outdoor air system is the single biggest lever for both energy savings and comfort
Why Schools Aren't Office Buildings
the practitioner had assumed his district could use the same equipment that worked in commercial offices. the practitioner showed him why that was dangerous:
The sensible heat factor (SHF) — the ratio of sensible cooling to total cooling — for the typical classroom was 0.69. A typical office SHF is 0.90.
What this means for you: Equipment designed for office environments will not perform correctly in school environments. The higher latent load in classrooms (from 20–30 breathing, perspiring students) demands equipment specifically selected for low sensible heat factor applications. Ignore this, and you'll get classrooms that hit the right temperature but feel clammy and uncomfortable.
Challenge #1: Regional Climate Issues
Your location fundamentally shapes your HVAC strategy:
Humid climates present the widest range of issues. Humidity control is critical to avoid mold growth and maintain good indoor air quality. Both the capacity and the operating mode of equipment must be considered.
Here's a trap the practitioner warned the practitioner about: A DX cooling system that cycles off several times an hour will allow large volumes of humid air to enter the space during off cycles. The equipment may technically meet the design cooling and dehumidification load, but it fails to maintain a proper environment because of how it operates.
Cold climates face freezing risks. Coil freeze-ups can cause catastrophic damage. Great care must be taken with outdoor air systems, particularly during morning startup in winter.
The lesson: Most schools are designed by local engineers familiar with local conditions. If you're designing in an unfamiliar region, invest time understanding the specific challenges before selecting equipment.
Challenge #2: Sound — The Silent Destroyer of Learning
the practitioner discovered that three of his elementary schools had classroom noise levels exceeding 55 dB — well above the recommended range for learning environments.
Recommended Sound Levels for School Spaces:
| Space | A-Weighted Sound Level (dB) | Desired NC (Noise Criteria) |
|---|---|---|
| Libraries, Classrooms | 35–45 | 30–40 |
| Laboratories, Shops | 40–50 | 35–45 |
| Gyms, Multipurpose, Corridors | 40–55 | 35–50 |
| Kitchens | 45–55 | 40–55 |
Source: ASHRAE Handbook, adapted for general reference
Why classrooms are harder than offices for acoustics: There's little material to absorb sound energy. The hard, dense surfaces (concrete block walls, tile floors, whiteboards) reflect sound energy back into the room rather than absorbing it.
the practitioner developed a sound control strategy that you can replicate:
Equipment Location: Place sound-generating mechanical equipment (fan coils, water source heat pumps, fan-powered VAV boxes) in the corridor wherever possible — never in the classroom itself.
Duct Design for Acoustics:
- Use a minimum of 4 diffusers per standard classroom
- Line supply air ducts acoustically for the first 3 meters (approximately 10 feet)
- Install a lined return air elbow for all systems using a corridor ceiling plenum as the return path
- Limit duct velocities to 4–5 m/s (800–1,000 fpm) to minimize turbulent noise
- Place volume control dampers between the flex duct and main duct, away from diffusers
The Diffuser Calculation Trap:
Most diffuser catalogs assume only one diffuser in the space and a room absorption of 10 dB. These assumptions work for offices but fail in classrooms.
Rule of Thumb: For each additional diffuser beyond one, subtract 3 dB from the cataloged NC rating. For 4 diffusers, subtract 9 dB from published performance data.
Discharge Sound Recommendations:
- 75 dB at 125 Hz
- 72 dB at 250 Hz
If duct lining isn't acceptable, specify a sound attenuator with an insertion loss of 10 dB at 125 Hz.
Challenge #3: Indoor Air Quality — The Non-Negotiable
The population density of the practitioner's average classroom (84 m² with thirty students) was three times that of a typical office. This made ventilation the most critical design parameter.
Outdoor Air Requirements for School Spaces:
| Application | Est. Max Occupancy (per 93 m² / 1,000 ft²) | Outdoor Air per Person | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classroom | 50 | 15 cfm / 8 L/s | — |
| Laboratories | 30 | 20 cfm / 10 L/s | Special contaminant control may be needed |
| Training Shops | 30 | 20 cfm / 10 L/s | — |
| Music Rooms | 50 | 15 cfm / 8 L/s | — |
| Libraries | 20 | 15 cfm / 8 L/s | — |
| Auditoriums | 150 | 15 cfm / 8 L/s | — |
| Locker Rooms | — | 2.5 L/s per m² | Transfer air |
| Corridors | — | 0.5 L/s per m² | — |
Source: ASHRAE Standard 62.1, adapted for general reference
Critical Design Requirements:
The minimum outdoor air rates represent the minimum supply air volume to the space. The total supply air can include both the minimum outdoor air and acceptable recirculated air. You can always supply more air to meet heating or cooling loads.
However — and this is where the practitioner's predecessor went wrong — the HVAC system must maintain space temperature and humidity at the minimum outdoor air rate. For VAV systems, the minimum airflow for the box must be at least the minimum outdoor air rate for the classroom. During mild weather, this may overcool the space, requiring reheat rather than airflow reduction.
The Multiple-Space Ventilation Equation
When a single system serves multiple spaces, you can't simply add up the outdoor air requirements. The critical space (the one needing the highest fraction of outdoor air) drives the calculation:
Formula:
Y = X / (1 + X - Z)
Where:
- Y = Corrected fraction of outdoor air in total supply
- X = Sum of all outdoor airflows ÷ total supply airflow
- Z = Outdoor air fraction required for the critical space
Example Calculation:
| Space | Outdoor Air (cfm) | Total Supply Air (cfm) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Classrooms | 450 × 5 = 2,250 | 1,200 × 5 = 6,000 |
| 1 Lab | 600 | 1,200 |
| Corridor | 50 | 300 |
| Total | 2,900 | 7,500 |
The quick assumption: 2,900 / 7,500 = 39% outdoor air
Wrong. The lab is the critical space — it requires 50% outdoor air.
X = 2,900 / 7,500 = 0.40
Z = 600 / 1,200 = 0.50
Y = 0.40 / (1 + 0.40 - 0.50) = 0.40 / 0.90 = 0.44
The correct minimum outdoor air setting is 44%, not 39%.
If you take one thing from this section: Failing to account for the critical space can result in under-ventilated classrooms, compromised IAQ, and potential code violations. Always run the multiple-space equation.
Demand Control Ventilation (DCV)
For spaces where population density varies significantly, DCV modulates outdoor air to match actual demand using CO₂ sensors.
Design Steps for DCV:
- Determine the design outdoor air rate without any diversity
- Install CO₂ sensors in the space or return air duct (single-zone systems) — for multi-zone systems, sensors in every zone or at least the critical zones
- Calculate maximum CO₂ concentration (typically ~1,000 ppm with ambient around 300 ppm)
- Maintain a minimum ventilation rate regardless of CO₂ levels to account for contaminants from building materials, carpeting, and furnishings
Humidity: The Invisible Threat
the practitioner learned that humidity control was perhaps the single most underrated factor in school design.
The optimal relative humidity range for schools is 40–60%. Outside this range, problems multiply:
| Humidity Level | Health/Building Risks |
|---|---|
| Below 30% | Increased respiratory infections, chemical interactions, ozone production, dry skin/eyes |
| 30–60% (Optimal) | Minimized bacteria, viruses, fungi, mites, respiratory infections |
| Above 60% | Mold growth, dust mite proliferation, allergic rhinitis, asthma triggers |
Humidification in dry climates isn't mandatory but improves occupant comfort. Dehumidification in humid climates is critical — undesirable microbials grow rapidly in damp locations.
The Design Crossroads: Choosing Your HVAC System
With data in hand, the practitioner and the practitioner faced the most consequential decision in the project: which HVAC system architecture to deploy across each school type.
The choice falls into two broad categories: Decentralized Systems and Central Systems. Each has profound implications for first cost, operating cost, complexity, serviceability, and performance.
DECENTRALIZED SYSTEMS
Why Decentralized Systems Deserve Your Serious Consideration
Decentralized systems give each zone a dedicated unit. This means one classroom can heat while another cools. Equipment failures affect only one zone. Scheduling is zone-specific, increasing savings.
Advantages:
- Equipment is straightforward to service — critical in rural areas
- Some decentralized systems rival the most advanced central systems for energy efficiency
- Zone-specific control and scheduling
- Single-zone failures don't cascade
Disadvantages:
- Maintenance is distributed throughout the building, often in occupied spaces
- Equipment life is generally shorter than central equipment
- Locating mechanical equipment near occupied spaces creates sound challenges
Unit Ventilators: The Only HVAC System Designed Specifically for Schools
When the practitioner asked the practitioner what conditioned more classrooms worldwide than any other system, the answer was immediate: unit ventilators.
Unit ventilators are unique because they include an integrated airside economizer that introduces proper ventilation directly into the classroom. The four-pipe version is one of the most energy-cost-effective systems because fan power consumption is minimal.
How Unit Ventilators Work: The Four Modes
Mode 1 — Full Recirculation (Unoccupied)
Only return air passes through the unit. The classroom maintains either occupied or setback temperature conditions without the expense of conditioning any outdoor air. This mode is also used for rapid warm-up or cool-down before occupancy.
Mode 2 — Face and Bypass (Economizer)
Outdoor air and return air mix, then flow around and through the coil(s) to maintain the room setpoint. The conditioned air is delivered to the classroom. This is the moderate-weather workhorse mode.
Mode 3 — Full Heating or Cooling
Outdoor air drops to the minimum design level (typically around 450 cfm / 210 L/s). Outside air and return air mix, then flow entirely through the coil and into the space.
Mode 4 — Full Economizer
The unit takes advantage of favorable outdoor conditions for free cooling. It can condition the classroom with up to 100% outside air without mechanical heating or cooling. This mode delivers the best IAQ and the lowest operating cost simultaneously.
Face and Bypass vs. Valve Control: A Critical Decision
the practitioner's predecessor had specified valve control on the middle school unit ventilators. the practitioner showed him why that was a mistake.
Valve control maintains the drybulb setpoint by modulating a control valve. It works — but it doesn't dehumidify as effectively as face and bypass control.
Face and bypass control forces all active airflow through the cooling coil at full capacity. The deeply dehumidified air then mixes with bypassed air. The result: same drybulb temperature, but significantly lower humidity.
| Parameter | Valve Control | Face & Bypass |
|---|---|---|
| Drybulb control | ✓ Good | ✓ Good |
| Dehumidification | ✗ Inferior at part load | ✓ Superior at all loads |
| Freeze protection | ✗ Risk — reduced water velocity | ✓ Maintains full coil flow |
| Variable flow compatible | ✓ Yes | ✓ With end-of-cycle shutoff valves |
| Humid climate suitability | ✗ Poor | ✓ Excellent |
| Cold climate suitability | ✗ Freeze risk | ✓ Excellent |
Strong recommendation: Face and bypass is the preferred control method for unit ventilators. If valve control is used, correct valve sizing is absolutely critical — oversized valves will cycle on/off instead of modulating, making performance even worse.
Draw Through vs. Blow Through
The draw-through fan arrangement offers two key advantages in unit ventilators:
- Even airflow across coils — important in the confined unit ventilator cabinet where airflow transitions are difficult
- Fan motor heat becomes reheat — added after the cooling coil, which is valuable given the high latent loads in classrooms
Draftstop: Solving the Cold Window Problem
In the practitioner's district, students sitting near windows in the older elementary schools complained of cold drafts throughout winter. the practitioner specified a Draftstop system that collects falling cold air from around the window and channels it to the unit ventilator for conditioning before returning it to the classroom.
If your school has large windows and cold-climate exposure, this is an inexpensive comfort upgrade that makes a real difference.
Classroom Exhaust: The Forgotten Half of Ventilation
A typical occupied classroom needs to exhaust approximately 450 cfm (210 L/s) to offset the incoming outdoor air. Without proper exhaust, the ventilation requirement simply won't be met, regardless of how much fresh air you pump in.
Options for classroom exhaust:
- Local relief shutters on the exterior wall
- Central exhaust fan ducted to 4–6 classrooms, interlocked with unit ventilator operation
- Corridor venting for after-hours use when exhaust fans are off
Unit Ventilators with Chillers and Boilers: The Performance Sweet Spot
the practitioner's biggest revelation came when the practitioner modeled the performance difference between self-contained DX unit ventilators and unit ventilators connected to a central chiller/boiler plant.
Why Central Plants Win on Performance
Using a central chiller and boiler with unit ventilators offers multiple advantages:
- Diversity: The chiller and boiler can be sized for the school block load rather than the connected load — smaller plants, lower first cost
- Efficiency: Piping and pump horsepower are significantly smaller than equivalent ductwork and fan horsepower
- Control: Chilled water and hot water provide accurate control with either face and bypass or valve control
- Sound: Chiller and boiler plants can be isolated from occupied spaces
- Heating flexibility: Central boilers can serve entrance convectors, cabinet heaters, and other heating needs from the same plant
Four-Pipe vs. Two-Pipe Systems
| Feature | Four-Pipe System | Two-Pipe Changeover |
|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous heat/cool | ✓ Yes — different classrooms can be in different modes | ✗ No — entire system in one mode |
| Piping cost | Higher — two insulated loops + two pump sets | Lower — single loop + single pump set |
| Unit ventilator cost | Higher — two coils per unit | Lower — one coil per unit |
| Construction cost | Baseline | ~25% less than four-pipe |
| Dehumidification with reheat | ✓ Yes | ✗ Not possible |
| Best application | Schools with core + perimeter zones needing different modes | Schools where budget is paramount and climate transitions are manageable |
Making Two-Pipe Changeover Work
If budget forces a two-pipe changeover system, energy standards typically require:
- A deadband of at least 15°F (8°C) outdoor air temperature between heating and cooling modes
- Controls allowing at least 4 hours of operation in one mode before changeover
- Supply temperature reset so that hot water and chilled water setpoints are no more than 30°F (17°C) apart at changeover
the practitioner showed the practitioner how the economizer built into every unit ventilator makes the transition manageable:
Mixed Air Temperature During Changeover Deadband:
At the upper changeover point (e.g., 65°F / 18°C ambient):
- 100% outdoor air supplies 65°F
- Minimum outdoor air supplies approximately 71°F
At the lower changeover point (e.g., 50°F / 10°C ambient):
- 100% outdoor air supplies 50°F
- Minimum outdoor air supplies approximately 65°F
Since two-thirds of the classroom load comes from outdoor air and internal heat gains — factors that are constant across all classrooms — all rooms behave approximately the same. Sudden swings from heating to cooling are unlikely unless weather changes radically.
Pro tip for two-pipe systems: Use a condensing boiler and operate the heating loop at 80°F (27°C), modulating up with an outdoor air reset controller. The lower temperature prevents the oversized-for-cooling coil from causing control problems during heating.
Piping and Pumping Design Essentials
Piping:
| Parameter | Chilled Water | Hot Water |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional entering/leaving temps | 44°F/54°F (6.7°C/12.2°C) | 180°F/160°F (82°C/71°C) |
| Flow rate result | 2.4 USgpm/ton | 1 MBH per USgpm |
| Insulation | Required per energy standards | Required per energy standards |
Reverse return piping is preferable for its inherent self-balancing. Direct return is possible but requires proper balancing valves.
Critical warning: Proper flushing of the piping system before startup is essential. Contaminants from construction can lodge in the small heat exchangers used in decentralized equipment and are extremely difficult to remove after the fact.
Pumping:
Redundancy is essential. Common approaches:
- Two pumps, each full capacity — one operating, one standby
- Three pumps, each half capacity — two operating, one standby
Energy standards typically require variable flow and isolation valves at each terminal device for systems exceeding 10 hp (7.5 kW) pump power. The system must operate down to at least 50% of design flow.
For variable flow, two-way control valves are required. Three-way valves are not acceptable. A bypass line maintains minimum flow (typically 33% or more, dictated by chiller/boiler requirements).
Condensing Boilers: The Smart Choice
the practitioner replaced his district's aging atmospheric boilers with high-efficiency condensing boilers. The advantages:
- Efficiency over 90%
- Modular design for staging and redundancy
- No circulating boiler pumps required
- Very small footprint — reduced mechanical room size
- Compatible with low-temperature heating loops for two-pipe changeover systems
Self-Contained Unit Ventilators: When Simplicity Wins
For the practitioner's smallest elementary schools, the practitioner recommended self-contained unit ventilators with integrated DX cooling.
Advantages:
- No chiller plant required
- Lower overall first cost
- Reduced complexity
- No mechanical room needed for cooling equipment
Disadvantages:
- Lower energy efficiency than chilled water systems
- Poorer space control, particularly for dehumidification
- No cooling diversity — every classroom gets its own compressor capacity
- Sound concerns from in-classroom compressors
Best applications:
- Small to medium elementary schools where cooling is required
- Portable/temporary classrooms (electric heat versions)
- Warmer climates where air-to-air heat pump versions can handle the heating load
Water Source Heat Pumps (WSHPs): The Versatile Workhorse
For the practitioner's two middle schools and the high school, the practitioner proposed a WSHP system. The concept proved transformative.
How the WSHP Loop Works
The WSHP concept moves energy around the school in water rather than air. Its main advantage is the ability to simultaneously add and subtract energy from a common loop. Heat collected from zones needing cooling is used to heat zones needing heating.
The WSHP loop is a single, uninsulated loop — significantly reducing first cost compared to insulated chilled water and hot water piping.
Best applications:
- Medium to large schools
- Schools with significant internal zones
- Retrofit applications
- Facilities needing simultaneous heating and cooling capability
Classroom WSHP Installation
The most common classroom arrangement uses ceiling-concealed heat pumps located in the corridor, ducted into the classroom. This placement:
- Moves compressor noise out of the learning space
- Allows service access without disrupting classes
- Enables ducted supply for good air distribution and sound attenuation
Vertical units in a closet beside the classroom improve serviceability but consume floor space.
Acoustic requirements are critical because WSHPs contain compressors. Specify units with extra-quiet construction and follow the duct design practices outlined earlier.
WSHP Unit Ventilators: Best of Both Worlds
Unit ventilators can be supplied in a WSHP configuration, combining the built-in airside economizer of a unit ventilator with the energy-sharing capability of a WSHP loop.
Limitations to consider:
- Face and bypass is not possible (refrigerant-cooled/heated coil)
- Heating capacity is limited — typically effective down to about 15°F (-9°C) ambient
- The heat pump water loop must be protected from freezing
For ambient conditions below the WSHP unit ventilator's heating capacity, you need either supplemental electric heating or a central system for outdoor air (which may only need to handle half the outdoor air requirement).
Ground Source Heat Pumps: Maximum Efficiency, Maximum First Cost
Ground source systems eliminate the need for boilers and closed circuit coolers. They operate with colder water than standard WSHPs (standard WSHP units cannot be used in ground source applications).
Ground Loop Sizing:
| Parameter | Typical Value |
|---|---|
| Vertical bore depth per ton | 150–200 feet (46–61 m) |
| Bore spacing | 15 ft (4.6 m) centers |
| Example: 250-ton school | 250 holes, 200 ft deep |
| Loop configuration | Parallel (minimizes pressure drop) |
| Backfill | Special material for enhanced heat transfer |
| Antifreeze | Required — discuss toxicity with school board |
The outdoor air challenge: The outdoor air load represents one-third of the system load. To fully leverage the ground loop, the design must address how to connect the outdoor air load to the ground loop. Options include:
- Water-to-water ground source heat pumps feeding an air handling unit
- A heat recovery device (Templifier-type) producing up to 140°F (60°C) hot water for outdoor air heating and entrance heaters, paired with an enthalpy wheel for cooling load reduction
Fan Coil Units: The Quiet Alternative
For the practitioner's library renovations and administrative wings, the practitioner specified fan coil units.
Like WSHPs, fan coils distribute cooling and heating through piping rather than ductwork. They require a chiller and boiler plant plus a dedicated outdoor air system. The critical advantage: no compressors mean no radiated sound issues.
System Configuration Recommendations:
| Configuration | Suitability for Schools |
|---|---|
| Two-pipe (single coil) | Not recommended — changeover is problematic for schools |
| Four-pipe (two coils) | Recommended — allows simultaneous heating and cooling |
Fan Coil Selection for Schools:
- Avoid lightweight office-style horizontal units — they won't survive the school environment
- Select large-capacity units with configuration flexibility and adequate static rating
- Belt-drive units offer the best range of static capabilities and air balancing
- Direct-drive units eliminate belt maintenance but have limited static ratings — three-speed versions help with balancing
Condensate management is required for all fan coil installations. Units need field-trapped and sloped drain pans. Ceiling units require condensate lines above the ceiling.
Condensate Line Sizing Guide:
| Pipe Size | Maximum Connected Cooling Load |
|---|---|
| ¾" (19 mm) | Up to 2 tons (7 kW) |
| 1" (25 mm) | Up to 5 tons (17.6 kW) |
| 1¼" (32 mm) | Up to 30 tons (105 kW) |
| 1½" (38 mm) | Up to 50 tons (176 kW) |
| 2" (50 mm) | Up to 170 tons (598 kW) |
| 3" (75 mm) | Up to 300 tons (1,055 kW) |
| 4" (100 mm) | Up to 430 tons (1,512 kW) |
| 5" (125 mm) | Up to 700 tons (2,461 kW) |
Note: Where horizontal runs employ a pitch of less than 1" per 10 ft (8 mm per m), increase one pipe size.
