← LibraryStakeholder Mapping: Salience ModelTemplates & Examples · Project TemplatesLesson 3/33← PrevNext →
TemplatePublished 15 Jul 20261 min readBy Kevin Joginstakeholder mappingsalience modelpowerurgency
Templates & Examples / Project Templates

Stakeholder Mapping: Salience Model

Classify stakeholders by combinations of three critical attributes: Power, Urgency, and Legitimacy.

2 min read 2 Sections Resource Template

§1 The Salience Framework

The Salience Model classifies individuals based on their ability to impose their will (Power), the timeliness required to attend to their claims (Urgency), and the appropriateness of their involvement (Legitimacy). Stakeholders possessing all three attributes command the absolute highest priority.

Category Attributes Combined Strategic Engagement
Definitive Power + Urgency + Legitimacy Highest priority — act on their needs first.
Dominant Power + Legitimacy (no urgency) Strong claim but not pressing — keep them satisfied.
Dependent Urgency + Legitimacy (no power) Need project manager advocacy because they cannot act alone.
Dangerous Power + Urgency (no legitimacy) Coercive — manage carefully as they may surface issues quickly.
Dormant Power only Latent influence; communicate enough to stay aware.
Discretionary Legitimacy only Worth informing; little immediate effect on the project.
Demanding Urgency only Noisy but low influence — acknowledge, but do not over-invest.
Contents ↑

§2 Worked Example: Website Project

Applying the Salience Model to "Mary's Consulting - New Company Website" highlights where the project manager must focus immediate attention versus long-term advocacy.

Classification Identified Stakeholders Contextual Note
Definitive Mary (CEO / Sponsor); Marketing Lead Direct capital and operational owners.
Dominant IT / Hosting Ops; Legal / Compliance Required gatekeepers without immediate daily blockers.
Dependent Bob, Bill, Christine; Sales Lead; Consultant Community Highly reliant on the project manager to facilitate their needs and resolve blockers.
Discretionary Fortune 500 Prospects; Hosting / CMS Vendor Have a legitimate place in the ecosystem but limited power to alter the current course.
Note on Empty Categories: For this specific project cycle, no stakeholders met the criteria for Dangerous, Dormant, or Demanding classes. This is standard in highly regulated or well-scoped corporate environments.
Contents ↑

Continue learning

Stakeholder Analysis WorksheetTemplate · Project TemplatesStakeholder Mapping: Power / Interest GridTemplate · Project TemplatesNEXT LESSON →Stakeholder Mapping: Directions of InfluenceTemplate · Project TemplatesProject Calendar Template & ExampleTemplate · Project Templates