← LibraryComputing Ext GroupsEngineering · MathematicsLesson 3/7← PrevNext →
GuidePublished 6 Aug 20264 min readBy Kevin JoginComputational Number TheoryExtensionsExt and TorExt Computation
Skip to the main content

MathematicsExtensions, Ext and Tor

Computing Ext Groups

Practical technique: choose the easy variable, use the long exact sequences, and know the standard table by heart.

Executive summary

Resolve the easy variable and shift dimensions

Ext is rarely computed from the definition. The practical toolkit is small: pick whichever variable has the shorter resolution, use additivity to split direct sums, use the long exact sequences to relate an unknown Ext to known ones, and use dimension shifting to reduce higher Ext to Ext1 of a syzygy. Over the integers everything reduces to one computation that is worth memorising.

Learning objectives

  • Choose the variable that minimises work.
  • Apply additivity across direct sums.
  • Use the long exact sequences to compute an unknown term.
  • Apply dimension shifting.
  • Reproduce the standard table of Ext groups over ℤ.

Section 01The standard table over ℤ

Ext<sup>1</sup><sub>&#8484;</sub>(C, A) for the basic cases
CAExt1(C, A)Reason
any0ℤ is free, hence projective
ℤ/mℤℤ/mℤFrom the length-one resolution
ℤ/mℤℤ/nℤℤ/gcd(m, n)ℤA/mA with A = ℤ/nℤ
ℤ/mℤ0ℚ is divisible, hence injective
ℝ (as a ℚ-vector space, uncountable)ℚ is not projective — a genuinely infinite Ext
any Cinjective A0Every extension splits
Ext<sup>1</sup>(&#8474;, &#8484;) is not zero

It is uncountable. ℚ is torsion-free but not free, and not projective, so extensions of ℚ by ℤ abound. This is the standard counterexample to the assumption that torsion-free behaves like free outside the finitely generated case.

Section 02Additivity and reduction

Ext converts finite direct sums into direct sums in either variable, and converts an arbitrary direct sum in the first variable into a product:

Extn(⊕i Ci, A) ≅ ∏i Extn(Ci, A)

Combined with the structure theorem, this computes Ext between any two finitely generated abelian groups: decompose both, apply the table entry by entry, reassemble.

AlgorithmExt between finitely generated abelian groupsin: finitely generated abelian C, A  →  out: Ext1(C, A)
  1. Decompose C and A into cyclic factors by the structure theorem.
  2. Discard any free factor of C — it contributes 0 to Ext1. Free is projective.
  3. For each pair of cyclic factors, read the entry from the table.
  4. Assemble the direct sum over all pairs.
  5. Extn = 0 for n ≥ 2, since ℤ is a PID.
The result: Ext1(C, A) depends only on the torsion of C and, for a free A, equals the torsion subgroup of C.

Section 03Long exact sequences and dimension shifting

A short exact sequence in either variable produces a long exact sequence in Ext. Two unknowns and one known term usually determine the third.

… → Extn(C, A) → Extn(C, B) → Extn(C, C′) → Extn+1(C, A) → …
AlgorithmDimension shiftingin: Extn(C, A) for n > 1  →  out: Ext1 of a syzygy
  1. Take a short exact sequence 0 → K → P → C → 0 with P projective.
  2. The long exact sequence has Extn(P, A) = 0 for n ≥ 1. P is projective, so its higher Ext vanishes.
  3. Exactness then forces Extn(K, A) ≅ Extn+1(C, A) for n ≥ 1.
  4. Iterating reduces Extn of C to Ext1 of the (n−1)st syzygy.
This is the standard induction device. Almost every proof about higher Ext reduces to the case n = 1 by this argument.
Choose the variable deliberately

For Ext(ℤ/m, A) resolve the first variable — the resolution has length 1. For Ext(C, ℚ/ℤ) resolve the second — the target is already injective and the answer is immediate. Time spent choosing is repaid many times.

ReferenceFrequently asked questions

Is Ext<sup>1</sup>(C, A) = 0 enough to conclude C is projective?

Only if it vanishes for every A. Vanishing for one particular A says only that extensions by that A split. The projectivity criterion is universal quantification over the second variable.

How do I compute Ext over a non-commutative ring?

The same way, but the result is only an abelian group, not a module, unless extra structure is present. When Λ is an algebra over a commutative ring k, Ext is a k-module, which is the usual working situation in group and Lie algebra cohomology.

Why is Ext<sup>1</sup>(&#8474;/&#8484;, &#8484;) interesting?

It is isomorphic to the profinite completion of ℤ, which appears in the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology with compact supports and in comparisons between algebraic and topological completions. It is a good illustration that Ext of large modules can be structurally rich.

NavigateContinue in this stream

Curated next steps from this page. The site also surfaces algorithmically related reading below.

ProvenanceSources and further reading

This page is an original KEVOS explanatory article. It presents the underlying mathematics — definitions, algorithms, complexity results and selection criteria — in KEVOS editorial voice. No text is reproduced from any copyrighted source. Where numerical tables are relevant, KEVOS links to live authoritative databases rather than republishing static values.

Page ID
KV-MATH-0120
Taxonomy
ENG-MATH — Engineering / Mathematics
Collection
COL-HOMALG-001
Topic stream
HA-EXT-TOR
Version
1.1.0 / content 2026.08
Last reviewed
2026-08-06

Continue learning

The Ext FunctorGuide · MathematicsNEXT LESSON →The Two Long Exact Sequences of ExtGuide · MathematicsExtensions of Modules and the Baer SumGuide · MathematicsThe Stein–Serre Theorem for Abelian GroupsGuide · Mathematics